© Centre for European Studies - Alexandru
Ioan Cuza University of Iași
Results.
Study on “Romania’s actorness in
the immediate eastern
neighbourhood (external and
internal perceptions)”
Summary: This study constructed an
analytical framework for assessing state's
external
capacity, based
on a six-factor
index
comprising both
hard and soft
elements of
power (namely,
1. size and
geographic
location, 2.
economy, 3. military, 4. historical experience
and culture, 5. domestic institutional capacity
and expertise, 6. membership in international
organizations). The study investigated
afterwards how the image of Romania is
perceived in the neighbourhood, namely in
the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine
(external perceptions), and in Romania itself
(internal perceptions), according to each of
the aforementioned factors. The study
includes at the end 3 sets of policy-
recommendations from each of the 3
countries: Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova
and Romania.
The study can be accessed here [.pdf file]:
English version| Romanian version
Graphs with the external public
perceptions on Romania's foreign
and security capacity (views from
Ukraine and the Republic of
Moldova)
Summary: To observe Romania's actorness in
the eastern neighbourhood we conducted
nation-wide questionnaire-based surveys both
in Ukraine and in the Republic of Moldova. The
surveys were conducted by two contracted
companies (one for Ukraine, one for the
Republic of Moldova) in August-September
2019 and were based on a representative
quota sample. The sample size for Ukraine
included 2000 participants, while for the
Republic of Moldova the sample size included
1212 participants from both rural and urban
areas; the sample size respected gender, age,
and regional breakdown of the population in
each country. The survey questions (identical
for each country) were grouped around six
main sections corresponding to each of the
factors, which, according to our analysis,
shape a country’s external profile, namely: size
(surface and population) and geographic
location; economic weight; military
capabilities; historical experience and culture;
domestic institutional capacity and expertise;
membership in international organizations.
The study can be accessed here [.pdf file]